Claim: "The UK only accounts for 1% of global emissions so what we do makes no difference"
Quick Reply
If every country responsible for a small share of emissions opted out, global action would collapse. Countries emitting less than 2% each together account for over a third of global emissions. The UK also has historic responsibility, major international influence, and strong self-interest in protecting its own economy, food security and infrastructure from worsening climate impacts.
More Detail
If everyone said this, little would happen
Together, countries emitting less than 2% each, account for roughly 36% of global emissions. If all of them used the same excuse, global action would fail.
Shared problems require shared action. One household represents only a tiny fraction of total water use yet hosepipe bans still matter. One voter rarely changes an election, yet most people agree that voting matters.
Britain is not just “any” 1%
The UK helped pioneer the fossil-fuel economy and still has outsized influence through finance, diplomacy, media and technology. UK cumulative emissions since the Industrial Revolution add to 4.5% of the global total, making us one of the biggest emitters.
What Britain does matters, and leading by example is the best way to influence others. Britain helped build the fossil-fuel age, benefiting greatly from North Sea oil and gas. We cannot credibly argue that we bear almost no responsibility for helping address its consequences.
This is about protecting Britain too
Climate and nature breakdown already affects food prices, flooding, infrastructure, insurance and national security. Taking action is not charity - it is self-protection.
The real question
The issue is not whether Britain can solve the crisis alone. Of course it cannot.
It is whether we help shape the future or become dependent on countries that do.
